Automatic
Account Determination
This
is perhaps the part that causes the most heartache for the FI Configure.
For some reason, although it is an integration area, the FI team always ends up
with responsibility for it. The IMG section under GL / business transactions / integration will take you through all the necessary account determination for the automatic postings that the system may need to post. You may not need all of these.You could maintain on an as needed basis. As the project teams test or prototype their expanding functionality, the SAP system will look for the accounts to which it should post. The error message and the SAP documentation and configuration does not always explain clearly which piece of account determination is used for which type of functionality, so it is sometimes difficult to be pro-active.
Being reactive has the benefit that hopefully each side (eg: MM and FI) can develop an understanding of what the business transaction is and therefore where it should be posting. Otherwise the MM person may not even be aware that he has generated a certain type of posting ! (You'd be amazed at some of the lack of ownership from a logistics consultant for the financial postings that they generate).
Will be explaining each account determination area simply and clearly with posting examples
Whenever you change the field status settings for an account, ensure that you have verified that any automatic postings will be able to meet the requirements. EG: do not make business area mandatory if your system may make a posting which cannot determine and post the business area.
Consider
specifying that accounts that are posted to automatically can only be posted to
automatically. This will simplify reconciliation between the source
module and the GL account should you need to do this.
SD-FI Account Determination and Postings
This
is known in the IMG as "revenue account determination", but it covers
a lot more than that (discounts, taxes etc). This is what determines how
the financial impact of your SD Billing document is posted into the FI General
Ledger. The integration is controlled both in SD and in FI.
In SD there is a awesome area of configuration called the pricing procedures.The pricing procedure determines the final price quoted to the customer for a particular product. This could be a complicated calculation taking into account the base price, any special prices or discounts that may apply to that scenario, taxes, freight charges etc. These prices or charges are called 'condition types'. This condition technique is used in a number of areas of SAP.
For now all we need to know is that each condition type is assigned to an account key (or in the case of rebates two account keys). You can assign multiple condition types to the same account key. There are a number of account keys that are pre-defined in the system. For example:
ERF freight revenues
ERL revenues
ERS sales deductions
EVV cash settlement
MWS sales tax
So, taking the simple approach we would ignore most of the configuration possibilities : procedures, access sequences, condition tables etc (Yes it is that 'condition technique' kicking in again. Once you have worked through it once in one area and encounter it in another then hopefully you will be comfortable in knowing that most of the standard configuration can be left as is. )
We have to decide which access sequences we want to use (Five access sequences are defined in the standard SAP R/3 System). To keep it simple, let us assume we just use one - for example: the access sequence "chart of accounts/sales org./account keys".
The chart of accounts part is standard in all account determinations, so let us look at the rest. This access sequence allows us to specify different GL accounts for different Sales Organisations.
So if we had a billing document line item where the customer had some special deductions for one of the products he purchased, we could map accounts by Sales Organisation. To make it even simpler a document is within one Sales Organisation so we have an overall mapping as follows:
SD Line
Item
|
Condition
type
|
SD Amount
|
Account
Key
|
Sales
Organisation
|
GL
Account
|
1
|
Sales deduction for being such a nice guy
|
$10
|
ERS
|
1000
|
800010 - Sales deductions for 1000
|
Sales deduction for special promotion on particular product
|
$15
|
ERS
|
|||
Base Revenue
|
$200
|
ERL
|
800000 - Revenue for Sales Org 1000
|
||
|
Total for item 1
|
$175
|
|
||
2
|
Base Revenue
|
$100
|
ERL
|
1000
|
800000 - Revenue for Sales Org 1000
|
|
Total for item 2
|
$ 100
|
|
||
Document Total
|
$ 275
|
|
Item
(Note this is the SD Invoice line item)
|
Amount
|
Item 1:
|
$175
|
Item 2:
|
$100
|
Total
owing , 30 days terms etc:
|
$275
|
FI Line
Item
|
Debit /
Credit
|
Account
|
Amount
|
1
|
Debit (PK=01)
|
Customer (AR Account)
|
$ 275
|
2
|
Credit (PK=50)
|
Revenue (GL Account)
|
-$ 300
|
3
|
Debit (PK=40)
|
Sales Deduction (GL Account)
|
$25
|
Balancing to 0 as all GL documents must.... |
$0
|
Other considerations:
Remember that if you are using business areas, then depending on
your configuration there, the system may create additional FI line items if it
needs to post to different business areas. This may be even more of a
reason why you do not need additional GL accounts. If your Sales
Organisations already map to different business areas, you could use the GL
accounts for all Sales Organisations.
Different access sequences will allow a broader variety of GL
accounts (for example: by customer account) group. I strongly suggest having a
good understanding of the reporting requirements expected to be supported from
the General Ledger vs the SIS (Sales Information System) or CO-PA
(Profitability Analysis) or (CO-PCA) Profit Centre modules before you create
too many GL accounts. At the risk of repeating myself, the SD to FI
account determination should only be as detailed as your statutory reporting
requirements. The reporting from other tools like Profitability
Analysis are so much more flexible and powerful, you may never look at the
General Ledger for internal profit reporting again except to do a
reconciliation check.
The SAP
Condition technique
Conditions
have many uses in SAP. The easiest to understand or to relate to is
usually in Pricing, where conditions are used to specify the many components of
a price (base price, surcharges, discounts, freight, taxes etc). These
components may differ for different customers, materials, regions - in fact
they may differ in a lot of ways depending on the particular businesses
requirements. We may give a customer in West Australia a better price or
discount for a product than a customer in NSW for example.We start with a procedure which I think of as a "spreadsheet". This "spreadsheet" tells the system the calculations to do and the order in which to do them to calculate the final price or cost of an order item. Each type of calculation is specified by a condition type. In other words the condition type is simply telling the system what kind of calculation to do (a flat amount or a percentage for example). It does not in itself say what numbers to use.
Procedure
(Spreadsheet)
|
||
Line
Number
|
Condition
Type (Calculation Type)
|
Based On
Line
|
10
|
Price
|
|
20
|
Discount
|
20
|
|
Total
|
|
It first works out which procedure to use (using procedure determination configuration). Then for that procedure, it needs to look up what numbers to use for the calculations in the "spreadsheet". IE: what prices apply here, what discounts, what taxes for this customer, material etc.
For each condition type (or calculation type), there can be lots of records in the system with numbers (e.g.: lots of different prices). The system needs to know which is the right record (or price) and in which order should it look for the right record. The configuration lets us specify an "access sequence" for each condition type. The access sequence tells the system in what order to should "access" or look for records.
For example for the 'PRICE' condition type it may have the following order:
'Price'
Access (Look Up) Sequence
|
|
Description
|
Table
|
Region / material
|
100
|
Customer Group / material
|
120
|
Material
|
200
|
Region
|
Material
|
Price
|
WA
|
X
|
10
|
NT
|
X
|
12
|
Customer
Group
|
Material
|
Price
|
A
|
X
|
11
|
Material
|
Price
|
X
|
15
|
Y
|
200
|
Worked
Examples using data from the example tables above
|
||||
Customer
|
Customer
Group (from the customer master)
|
Region
|
Material
|
Price
|
1234
|
A
|
NSW
|
X
|
11
|
1224
|
A
|
WA
|
X
|
10
|
2346
|
C
|
QLD
|
X
|
15
|
1224
|
A
|
WA
|
Y
|
200
|